A 73-year-old man presented to an oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic with a black and blue-grey lesion (about 20 mm by 10 mm) in the maxillary gingiva. It was asymmetric, had irregular edges and was without notches, erosion or induration (Figure 1A). The lesion was located above a porcelain tooth fused to a metal bridge, which had been inserted about 40 years previously. Since the patient was asymptomatic, the timing of the lesion onset was unknown. Our differential diagnosis included amalgam tattoo, nevus, melanotic macules, melanoacanthoma, melanoma and physiologic pigmentation.
We biopsied the lesion and histological analysis showed numerous black granules in the connective tissue (Figure 1B). Immune staining was negative for HMB-45. We diagnosed an amalgam tattoo.
An amalgam tattoo is among the most common pigmented lesions in the oral mucosa. Anterior resin or ceramic prostheses require alloys for reinforcement and abutment construction in nonvital teeth to achieve adequate strength. Dental alloys are mainly composed of gold, palladium, silver and copper. Amalgam- and silver alloy–containing prostheses may release silver into the oral environment. Soluble silver compounds can be transported and subsequently deposited in the soft tissue, resulting in chronic, asymptomatic and persistent lesions that can enlarge. Melanoma should be ruled out for any pigmented gingival lesion. Although oral mucosal melanoma is uncommon, its prognosis is poor (5-yr survival of 33%).1 They manifest as black, grey, purple to red and, rarely, amelanotic lesions with irregular pigmentation; they are usually asymmetric, with irregular margins and a predilection for the hard palate and gingiva.1 They can mimic amalgam tattoos. Hyperspectral imaging is an emerging diagnostic tool to differentiate between amalgam tattoos and other pigmented lesions.2 Although amalgam tattoos do not need treatment, surgical removal may be performed for esthetic concerns. Removal using an erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser is less invasive and easier than removal with free gingival grafts, and can reduce operative time and postoperative pain.3
Footnotes
Competing interests: None declared.
The authors have obtained patient consent.
This article has been peer reviewed.
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/