Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had profound effects on the mental wellbeing of adolescents. We sought to evaluate pandemic-related changes in health care use for suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm.
Methods: We obtained data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information on emergency department visits and hospital admissions from April 2015 to March 2022 among adolescents aged 10–18 years in Canada. We calculated the quarterly percentage of emergency department visits and hospital admissions for a composite outcome comprising suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm relative to all-cause emergency department visits and hospital admissions. We used interrupted time-series methods to compare changes in levels and trends of these outcomes between the prepandemic (Apr. 1, 2015–Mar. 1, 2020) and pandemic (Apr. 1, 2020–Mar. 31, 2022) periods.
Results: The average quarterly percentage of emergency department visits for suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm relative to all-cause emergency department visits was 2.30% during the prepandemic period and 3.52% during the pandemic period. The level (0.08%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.79% to 0.95%) or trend (0.07% per quarter, 95% CI −0.14% to 0.28%) of this percentage did not change significantly between periods. The average quarterly percentage of hospital admissions for the composite outcome relative to all-cause admissions was 7.18% during the prepandemic period and 8.96% during the pandemic period. This percentage showed no significant change in level (−0.70%, 95% CI −1.90% to 0.50%), but did show a significantly increasing trend (0.36% per quarter; 95% 0.07% to 0.65%) during the pandemic versus prepandemic periods, specifically among females aged 10–14 years (0.76% per quarter, 95% CI 0.22% to 1.30%) and females aged 15–18 years (0.56% per quarter, 95% CI 0.31% to 0.81%).
Interpretation: The quarterly change in the percentage of hospital admissions for suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm increased among adolescent females in Canada during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. This underscores the need to promote public health policies that mitigate the impact of the pandemic on adolescent mental health.
The World Health Organization declared the global COVID-19 pandemic on Mar. 11, 2020. In response, Canada’s governments restricted in-person education, limited public and private gatherings and closed nonessential businesses.1,2
During the pandemic, social isolation — compounded by fears of contagion and financial hardship — may have had greater emotional effects on children and adolescents than other age groups3,4 as they are particularly vulnerable to the psychological distress associated with social isolation.5 Several studies reported a decrease in emergency department visits and admissions for self-harm behaviour in adolescents during the first few months of the pandemic, followed by an increase in visits and admissions.6–14 In many Canadian provinces, restrictions to community mental health resources diminished access to outpatient care. Evidence of the impact this had on use of mental health care through pandemic waves and after the initiation of vaccination programs is lacking. It also remains unclear whether specific age groups were more strongly affected than others. The incidence of adolescent mental health visits to emergency departments was increasing before the pandemic.15 Understanding which demographics accounted for increased health care use during the pandemic at a national level is fundamental to enabling public policymakers in Canada to focus resources and mitigate the impact of the pandemic on what may already be a growing problem among adolescents.
We sought to test the hypothesis that the observed percentage of emergency department visits and admissions for suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm increased during the COVID-19 pandemic relative to all-cause visits, compared with the expected percentage based on the prepandemic period.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective, interrupted time-series analysis using Canadian administrative health care databases. Our findings were reported using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist.16
Data sources
To identify patients aged 10–18 years with emergency department visits and hospital admissions for suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm, we used the Canadian version of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10-CA) codes R458 (suicidal ideation, except for Quebec where it maps to “other symptoms/troubles of the mood”), X60–69 (intentional self-poisoning) and X70–84 (intentional self-harm) from the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS), Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) and Hospital Morbidity Database (HMDB), overseen by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. These codes encompass emotional symptoms, suicidal attempts and nonsuicidal self-injury. 15,17,18 We chose the lower age limit because of concerns that inclusion of younger children, who had a dramatic reduction in overall emergency department visits for viral illnesses,10,14,19,20 would inflate our estimates for mental health visits. We were also concerned that the small number of emergency department visits for suicidal ideation and self-harm among children younger than 10 years would lead to extensive suppression of cell sizes less than 5. To account for seasonality and prepandemic trends, the model included data from Apr. 1, 2015, to Mar. 31, 2022. The NACRS data included all hospital-and community-based ambulatory visits, including emergency department visits, day surgeries, outpatient visits and community clinic visits, but reporting varied by province or territory and by year, and was only comprehensively mandated in Ontario, Alberta and the Yukon (Appendix 1, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.220507/tab-related-content).21 The DAD captured administrative, clinical and demographic information on hospital discharges, deaths and transfers. Data from the DAD and HMDB were available for all provinces and territories. Data from Quebec were appended to the DAD to create the HMDB. When more than 1 diagnostic code was recorded, we analyzed the first diagnosis recorded in the medical record.
Exposure
The exposure occurred in March 2020, when the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 pandemic and the Public Health Agency of Canada implemented guidance to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2.1,2 To enable analysis of events by quarter, we defined the prepandemic period as Apr. 1, 2015, to Mar. 31, 2020, and the pandemic period as Apr. 1, 2020, to Mar. 31, 2022.
Outcomes
The primary and secondary outcomes were the percentage of emergency department visits and hospital admissions, respectively, for a composite of suicidal ideation, intentional self-poisoning and intentional self-harm. We chose a composite variable to overcome the potential of too few events per diagnostic category.
Statistical analysis
We reported counts and percentages of emergency department visits and admissions by age, sex and reason for visit. To minimize suppression of small cell sizes, we divided the study period into 3-month time periods. We decided a priori to stratify data by age (10–14 yr and 15–18 yr) and sex, given the higher prevalence of suicidal behaviour among females22 and older adolescents.23 To evaluate the impact of the pandemic on quarterly percentage of outcomes, we applied an interrupted time-series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models. The ARIMA models use t-ratios to test the significance of the difference between the regression slopes (change per quarter in the average number of emergency department visits or hospital admissions for the composite outcome as a percentage of all-cause visits or admissions) before and after March 2020. We compared the level (stepwise change) from the last quarter of the prepandemic period (Apr. 1, 2015 to Mar. 31, 2020) to the first quarter of the pandemic period (Apr. 1, 2020 to Mar. 31, 2022) and slope (differences between the prepandemic and pandemic periods in the quarterly change in percentage of emergency department visits and admissions for the composite outcome relative to all-cause visits and admissions). We conducted a sensitivity analysis of emergency department visits including only jurisdictions where submission to NACRS was mandated. We accounted for heteroscedasticity and used correlograms depicting autocorrelation, partial autocorrelation and inverse autocorrelation functions to guide initial model selection, adjusting nonseasonal and additive seasonal ARIMA model parameters to account for best model fit. We evaluated the presence of white noise by the autocorrelations at various lags using the Ljung–Box χ2 statistic. We assessed stationarity using the augmented Dickey–Fuller test. The date of the exposure and subsequent outcome events were reflected as ramp functions in the regression models. We analyzed data using SPSS version 27 (IBM).
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.
Results
The prepandemic period had an average of 5293 emergency department visits per quarter for the composite of suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm among adolescents aged 10–18 years. This increased to 6060 emergency department visits per quarter during the pandemic period. The average quarterly number of all-cause emergency department visits decreased from 230 080 during the prepandemic period to 172 180 during the pandemic period (Table 1).
The prepandemic period had an average of 1590 hospital admissions per quarter for the composite of suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm among adolescents aged 10–18 years. This increased to 1770 admissions per quarter during the pandemic period. The average quarterly number of all-cause hospital admissions decreased from 22 137 during the prepandemic period to 19 762 during the pandemic period (Table 2).
Emergency department visits
Among all adolescents aged 10–18 years, an average of 3.52% of all emergency department visits per quarter during the pandemic period were for the composite outcome, compared with 2.30% during the prepandemic period (Table 3). The percentage of emergency department visits for the composite, relative to all-cause visits, did not have a significant, immediate stepwise change from the last quarter of the prepandemic period to the first quarter of the pandemic period (level change 0.08%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.79% to 0.95%). The percentage of emergency department visits for the composite outcome increased very slightly over time during the prepandemic period and this trend did not change significantly during the pandemic period (change in trend 0.07% per quarter, 95% CI −0.14% to 0.28%) (Table 3 and Appendix 2, Supplementary Table 1, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.220507/tab-related-content).
The percentage of emergency department visits for the composite outcome, relative to all-cause visits, was higher among females than among males and among older than younger adolescents during both the prepandemic and pandemic periods (Figure 1). We did not observe any significant immediate stepwise changes or changes in trend between the prepandemic and pandemic periods in any sex and age group (Table 3).
A sensitivity analysis limited to jurisdictions where comprehensive reporting of emergency department visits in NACRS was mandated showed similar results to the primary analysis (Appendix 3, Supplementary Table 2 and Appendix 4, Supplementary Table 3, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.220507/tab-related-content). However, an analysis of absolute numbers of emergency department visits for the composite outcome, without adjustment for trends in all-cause emergency department visits, showed a significant immediate decrease of 2624 (95% CI −4306 to −942) emergency department visits in the first quarter of the pandemic period, compared with the last quarter of the prepandemic period. Emergency department visits for the composite outcome increased significantly during the pandemic period by an average of 436 (95% CI 90 to 782) visits per quarter (Appendix 5, Supplementary Table 4, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.220507/tab-related-content).
Hospital admissions
Among all adolescents aged 10–18 years, an average of 8.96% of all hospital admissions per quarter during the pandemic period were for the composite outcome, compared with 7.18% during the prepandemic period (Table 4). The percentage of admissions for the composite outcome, relative to all-cause admissions, did not have a significant, immediate stepwise change from the last quarter of the prepandemic period to the first quarter of the pandemic period (level change −0.70%, 95% CI −1.90% to 0.50%). However, in contrast to the prepandemic period, the percentage of admissions for the composite outcome increased significantly over time during the pandemic period (change in trend 0.36% per quarter, 95% CI 0.07% to 0.65%) (Table 4 and Appendix 6, Supplementary Table 5, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.220507/tab-related-content). This increasing trend was seen primarily among females aged 10–14 years (change in trend 0.76% per quarter, 95% CI 0.22% to 1.30%) and females aged 15–18 years (change in trend 0.56% per quarter, 95% CI 0.31% to 0.81%) (Table 4 and Figure 2). Changes over time in the composite outcome were driven by increases in intentional self-poisoning (change in trend 0.24% per quarter, 95% CI 0.07% to 0.41%) and suicidal ideation (change in trend 0.12%, 95% CI 0.02% to 0.22%) (Table 4).
An analysis of absolute numbers of hospital admissions for the composite outcome, without adjustment for trends in all-cause admissions, showed a significant immediate decrease of 694 (95% CI −1296 to −91) admissions in the first quarter of the pandemic period, compared with the last quarter of the prepandemic period (Appendix 7, Supplementary Table 6, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.220507/tab-related-content). Admissions for the composite outcome increased significantly during the pandemic period by an average of 150 (95% CI 2 to 297) visits per quarter.
Interpretation
This Canadian population-based study found that the percentage of hospital admissions for suicidal ideation and self-harm among female adolescents increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight the importance of understanding the drivers of mental health concerns among female adolescents that lead to increased use of health care resources during pandemics. Our work may also inform policies to support sustained access to services for adolescents with mental illness and rationalize the development of screening programs for suicide risk that include younger adolescents.
Our findings parallel global reports of increased emergency department visits for mental health14 and self-harm20,24 among children, particularly for suicide attempts among adolescent females.8,25 Limited data are available for all of Canada, but in Ontario, outpatient visits for mental health initially decreased then rose to 10%–15% above prepandemic levels,6 with the greatest increase (39.7%) among females aged 10–14 years. Similarly, Saunders and colleagues6 found the greatest increase in Ontario emergency department visits and admissions for mental health during the pandemic was among females 7–12 years. It is unclear whether this increase was owing to a reduction in outpatient services or an increased severity of mental health presentations. During the pandemic, emergency department visits for mental health increased in the United States, with a greater proportion of visits resulting in admission.14,26 Although the global prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms among children and adolescents increased during the pandemic,27 the proportion of emergency department visits shifted away from depression and anxiety toward suicide and self-injury,26 concerns that are more likely to prompt admission. These increases mirror a prepandemic trend of increasing admissions28 and emergency department visits for self-harm among younger adolescents in the US29,30 and Canada.31 The reasons are unclear; however, the launch of several social media platforms in 2013 has been postulated as a contributing factor.30 Associations between mental health and developmentally inappropriate social media content32 and cyberbullying33 have been described, alongside increased access to these platforms and worsening mental health during the pandemic.34 Several studies have found a greater increase in emergency department visits for mental health among females than males.35 Several explanations have been postulated, including an increased prevalence of affective symptoms among females during the pandemic,25,36,37 and greater vulnerability to stressful life events38 such as domestic violence and child maltreatment.25,39 Our results and those of other studies suggest that public policies should ensure that mental health initiatives involve adolescents of all ages.
Among adolescents, the mental health morbidity associated with the pandemic has been postulated to result from reduced interactions with peers, teachers, counsellors and coaches, as well as decreased access to mental health support. 40 A meta-analysis found that the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms increased into the first quarter of 2021, and posited that ongoing social isolation, financial constraints and education disruptions may have had a cumulative effect on adolescents.27 Among adolescents with reduced in-person social interactions, etiological models have suggested that emotional stress associated with the pandemic was associated with self-harm41 and decreased access to support was a social stressor that may have exacerbated the risk of self-harm.42 Limited in-person access to health care providers and greater help-seeking behaviour have been suggested as possible explanations for increased self-harm presentations.20 Understanding the causes of suicidal ideation and self-harm during pandemics is fundamental to guiding effective strategies to mitigate mental health effects.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now supports mental health as part of its public health mission,43 underscoring the importance of galvanizing regional bodies to allocate resources to optimize mental health during pandemics. Given proposed links between depression and emergency department visits for suicidal ideation and self-harm among adolescents,44 one approach is to ensure sustained access to existing supports. Many North American schools provide mental health services to children.45 National advocacy supported retaining in-person education in Canada.46 Sustained access to services where adolescents with mental illness can continue to receive support is an important component of mitigating suicidal ideation and self-harm, particularly during the pandemic.
Our finding that the largest proportional increase in admissions was among younger females aligns with reports of increasing self-harm behaviour among young adolescents.29–31,47 This highlights the importance of including younger adolescents in screening programs for suicide risk that are developmentally appropriate and can be implemented in primary care settings. Age-based recommendations from The American Academy of Pediatrics include evidence-based, publicly available, and validated tools commonly used in youth 10 years and older.48
To minimize possible inflation of our estimates by lower numbers of non–mental health conditions among children younger than 10 years, we focused on adolescents aged 10–18 years. We found that average quarterly all-cause emergency department visits and admissions decreased during the pandemic for almost all strata. Future directions include developing robust etiological models and exploring the long-term impact of pandemics on mental health may better inform the breadth and duration of support required.
Limitations
This was an observational study using administrative databases, constrained by the limitations of aggregate data. Many ICD-10-CA codes for self-harm and other mental health conditions likely undercount both conditions in the emergency department setting. 49 Recent destigmatization campaigns surrounding mental health may have led to increased clinician awareness of self-harm, leading to increased mental health diagnoses. We lacked information on motivations for seeking care and other factors influencing self-harm behaviour during the pandemic, such as economic disadvantage, gender dysphoria,50 Indigenous status51 and urban residence.52 Because visits to the emergency department and admissions to hospital for all causes decreased among adolescents during the early phase of the pandemic, some of the change in the percentage of all visits was owing to a decrease in all-cause visits and admissions, in addition to an increase in composite events. It remains unclear whether the increased percentage of visits reflected greater prevalence of morbidity or a decline in access to outpatient resources. The NACRS database records only the primary problem leading to the visit, and other diagnoses related to mental health, such as disordered eating, were not included in our targeted ICD-10-CA code search. Similarly, we could not collect data on completed suicides that did not involve a health care visit. Regional variations in suicide have been reported in Canada; however, given grouping of provinces and regions to minimize the need to suppress small cell sizes, we were unable to explore these in our study.
Conclusion
Our Canadian population-based study showed that the quarterly change in hospital admissions for suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm increased among adolescent females during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic, relative to all-cause admissions. Our findings underscore the importance of understanding drivers behind health care use for mental health and the need to promote public health policies and intervention strategies to mitigate the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of adolescents.
Footnotes
Competing interests: Naveen Poonai reports research funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and Physicians Services Incorporated (PSI). Amanda Newton reports research funding from CIHR, the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute and Alberta Innovates. She sits on the mental health section board with the Canadian Paediatric Society. Samina Ali is a member of the scientific advisory board of the National Pain Advisory Council. Eleanor Fitzpatrick is executive chair of the IWK Research Ethics Board. Roger Zemek holds a Clinical Research Chair in Pediatric Concussion from the University of Ottawa, and receives research funding from the CIHR, Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, PSI Foundation, CHEO Foundation, Ontario Brain Institute, National Football League, Ontario Ministry of Health, Public Health Agency of Canada, Parachute Canada and Ontario SPOR Support Unit. He sits on the board of directors for the North American Brain Injury Society in a volunteer role and is a cofounder of and minority shareholder in 360 Concussion Care, an interdisciplinary concussion clinic; no proceeds have been transferred to him. No other competing interests were declared.
This article has been peer reviewed.
Contributors: Naveen Poonai, Scott Sawyer, Nathalie Gaucher and Quynh Doan contributed to the conception and design of the work. Michael Miller contributed to data acquisition and data analysis. All of the authors contributed to data interpretation. Naveen Poonai, Scott Sawyer, Nathalie Gaucher and Quynh Doan drafted the manuscript. All of the authors revised it critically for important intellectual content, gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding: This study was supported by the Lawson Health Research Institute and the Children’s Health Research Institute; Stephen Freedman is supported by the Alberta Children’s Hospital Foundation Professorship in Child Health and Wellness.
Data sharing: Deidentified participant data will be made available after approval of a proposal with a signed data sharing agreement and upon request of the corresponding author.
- Accepted August 16, 2023.
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/